<p>by Patrizio Tressoldi &amp; Debra Lynne Katz</p><p></p><h4 id="0688bd25-160f-4d48-8821-5870ea53f6f7" data-toc-id="0688bd25-160f-4d48-8821-5870ea53f6f7">HIGHLIGHTS</h4><p>Statistical analysis of the available evidence suggests that remote-viewing is the most efficient way to study “extrasensory perception” for experiments and practical applications.</p><h4 id="d26136d5-8cf6-4c6c-a010-f4657d6d5760" data-toc-id="d26136d5-8cf6-4c6c-a010-f4657d6d5760">ABSTRACT</h4><p>This is the first meta-analysis of all studies related to remote-viewing tasks conducted up to December 2022. After applying our inclusion criteria, we selected 36 studies with a total of 40 effect sizes. Both frequentist and Bayesian meta-analyses revealed a strong average effect size of .34; 95% confidence interval: .22 -.45, after the exclusion of outliers, without signs of publication bias and a minimal decline effect. In terms of raw scores, these average results correspond to a difference in hits score of 19.3%; 95% confidence intervals:13.6%–25%, above the expected chance. Among the meta-analyses of moderators, a small nonstatistical difference emerged between the precognitive and clairvoyance tasks, particularly for those with an outbound agent. A comparison among meta-analysis results observed with other experimental protocols testing extrasensory perception showed the clear superiority of remote viewing. After more than 50 years of investigation into extrasensory perception, remote-viewing experimental protocols appear to be the most efficient for both experimental and practical applications.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.debrakatz.com/s/Remote_Viewing_A_1974_2022_Systematic_Re-2-wcml.pdf"><strong><u>CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE PDF</u></strong></a></p>

Remote Viewing: A 1974- 2022 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Read articles, tips, and resources to help you learn, grow, and succeed. Explore our latest posts covering education, community, and personal growth

Blog – Insights, Tips & Resources for Learning and Growth

Explore articles, tips, and insights to help you succeed in learning, community building, and personal development.

Blog – Learn, Grow & Get Inspired

English

Unlimited

CaslonPro-Regular

MinionPro-Regular

MinionPro-Medium

MinionPro-Semibold

MinionPro-Bold

Figtree

First Name

Last Name

Email

City

What is your background with the subject matter?

What are your goals for this class or program?

Dashboard

Profile

Memberships

Courses

Coaching Programs

Bundle Courses

Communities

Groups

Digital Products

Physical Products

Live Products

Video Library

Audio Library

Events

Appointments

Premium Pages

Certificates

Badges

Order History

Coin History

Organization Orders

Subscription

Affiliate Dashboard

Settings

Billing

debrakatz

Primary Menu

Remote Viewing: A 1974- 2022 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Remote Viewing: A 1974- 2022 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Related Posts

Merten J. Mandeville Library of Parapsychology and Occultism Explorations and Adventures in Library Research at the University of Illinois

Predicting the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Using a Double-Blind Associative Remote Viewing Protocol

A 50 year history of remote viewing

Fridays with Ingo: Scientist and Psychic